View Issue Details
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0022175 | Community | OCCT:Modeling Algorithms | public | 2010-12-21 15:25 | 2017-10-14 09:32 |
| Reporter | Assigned To | ||||
| Priority | normal | Severity | feature | ||
| Status | closed | Resolution | won't fix | ||
| OS | All | ||||
| Summary | 0022175: Improvement of ProjLib_ProjectOnSurface | ||||
| Description | Contribution by Paulos Nyirenda (nyirenda01@gmail.com) "All is in the compressed file attached to this e-mail, including - notes - the modified ProjLib_ProjectOnSurface.cxx file - images of the results If there's any questions on this, I will be very gald to discuss. Further suggestions 1. make the distinction between NORMAL and OBLIQUE projection of curve on surface - NORMAL: this routine - OBLIQUE: in a specifed direction, i.e. where you use generalized cylinder intersection with surface (you have it in one of your BRep/LocalOP? packages, cannot recollect) 2. add a new class, GeomAPI_ProjectCurveOnSurface (with the two types of projection as options?) for users" | ||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
| Test case number | |||||
|
2010-12-21 13:29
|
|
|
|
Closed as outdated and apparently not of interest. This kind of improvements should be done on real use cases whuch are missing in this case. |
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-08-02 11:31 | bugmaster | Category | OCCT:MOA => OCCT:Modeling Algorithms |
| 2011-11-09 11:01 |
|
Assigned To | bugmaster => abv |
| 2011-11-09 11:10 |
|
Status | new => assigned |
| 2011-11-09 11:10 |
|
Fixed in Version | EMPTY => |
| 2011-11-09 11:10 |
|
Description Updated | |
| 2012-01-23 13:02 |
|
Project | Open CASCADE => Community |
| 2017-10-14 09:32 |
|
Note Added: 0071435 | |
| 2017-10-14 09:32 |
|
Status | assigned => closed |
| 2017-10-14 09:32 |
|
Resolution | open => won't fix |